home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.nyu.edu!schonberg!dewar
- From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu
- Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
- Date: 12 Apr 1996 17:51:43 -0400
- Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
- Message-ID: <dewar.829345812@schonberg>
- References: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <dewar.828704810@schonberg> <4k3utg$ndp@solutions.solon.com> <dewar.828757752@schonberg> <4kkbk7$hv8@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: schonberg.cs.nyu.edu
- X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 (NOV)
-
- Chuck said
-
- "With the same proviso, all of them. Of the many POSIX standards, only
- POSIX.1-1990 and POSIX.2-1992 have usable validation test suites."
-
- Fair enough, but I meant national or international standards when I asked
- my question.
-
- By the way, which Unices are 100% posix threads compliant (you ssaid you
- knew).
-
- How does the POSIX testing deal with the issue of test profiles, Dave,
- (Emery), can you clarify that procedure?
-
-